Spice Prop vs Funded Trading Plus — Full Comparison (Rules, Payouts, Pricing)
Two firms. One launched in 2024 with €45 entry accounts and pepper-themed models. The other launched in 2021 with a 100% profit split and a consistency rule that tightens after you pass. The difference between them is mostly about what happens after you get funded.
● Read our full Prop Spice Review
● Read our full Funded Trading Plus Review
Quick Comparison Table
| Feature | Spice Prop | Funded Trading Plus | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Founded | 2024 | 2021 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Max Allocation | €2M (Black Pepper) | $2.5M | Draw |
| Profit Split | 80–90% | 100% after milestones | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Drawdown Type | Static | Static & Trailing | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
| News Trading | Allowed | Allowed (no boom or bust) | Draw |
| Copy Trading | Prohibited | Prohibited | Draw |
| EAs | Allowed | Allowed — source code on request | Draw |
| VPN/VPS | Allowed (no identity hiding) | Not specified | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
| Trustpilot | 4.0/5 (532 reviews) | 4.4/5 (2,650 reviews) | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Hidden Rules Meter | 1.9/10 | 2.8/10 | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
In short, Spice Prop is simpler, more beginner-friendly & easier to navigate. Funded Trading Plus offers a higher profit split ceiling & a more established track record — but with more rules to navigate.
Profit Targets
Spice Prop:
● Sweet Pepper 2-Step — 4–7.5% per phase
● Chilli Pepper 1-Step — simplified lower targets
● Jalapeño Instant — 10% profit target, no evaluation
● Black Pepper Hot Seat — no standard evaluation, straight to funded
Funded Trading Plus:
● 1-Step Express — 10% single phase
● 2-Step Classic — 7% Phase 1, 7% Phase 2
● Instant Funding — no profit target
Spice Prop's 2-Step targets are lower than FTP's 2-Step Classic — 4–7.5% vs 7%/7%. For traders who want a more gradual evaluation, Spice Prop wins this round.
🏆 Winner: Spice Prop
Drawdown & Risk Rules
Spice Prop:
● Daily drawdown 3–5.5% depending on model
● Total drawdown 7–11%
● Static drawdown across all models
● Max 2% risk per trade on funded accounts
● Consistency score — max 30% profit from one day or trade
Funded Trading Plus:
● 1-Step Express & Instant — 6% trailing max loss
● 2-Step Classic — 8% static max loss
● Daily loss 4% static across all models
● 2-Step Classic consistency — 35% evaluation / 50% funded
● Symbol Loss Limit 3% on 2-Step Classic
Static drawdown across all Spice Prop models is more predictable than FTP's trailing on 1-Step & Instant. The consistency tightening from 35% to 50% on FTP's funded stage catches more traders than expected.
🏆 Winner: Spice Prop
Copy Trading & EAs
Both firms prohibit copy trading from external sources & account sharing. The key differences:
Spice Prop:
● Copy trading from own Funded Account → own Challenge account — allowed
● Copy trading between users or funded accounts — prohibited
● Short-term trades under 3 minutes — max 5% of total trades
● EAs allowed
Funded Trading Plus:
● Copy trading across accounts — prohibited in all directions
● EAs allowed — FTP may request source code access at any time
● Failure to provide source code → account termination
Spice Prop gives you more flexibility on copy trading between your own accounts. FTP's source code request clause is the more unusual condition — worth knowing before you deploy a custom EA.
🏆 Winner: Spice Prop
News Trading
Both firms allow news trading. The differences:
Spice Prop:
● Allowed — no specific window restrictions
● News hedging — opening buy + sell around news → prohibited
● Correlated pairs used to game news → prohibited
Funded Trading Plus:
● Allowed — no hard ban
● Boom or bust approach around news → prohibited
● Excessive risk exacerbated by news events → flagged as overleveraging
Both firms allow news trading with similar restrictions on gambling-style approaches. No meaningful difference here for most traders.
🏆 Winner: Draw
Payouts
Spice Prop:
● 14 active days required
● 4 profitable days minimum (≥0.5% each)
● €100 minimum profit
● KYC required
● Manual review up to 7 days if triggered
● Weekly payouts on Black Pepper
Funded Trading Plus:
● $50 minimum withdrawal on Instant & 1-Step Express
● 1% minimum withdrawal on 2-Step Classic funded stage
● Payouts processed within 24–48 hours ● 14-day cancellation right before first trade
● 100% profit split after performance milestones
FTP wins on payout speed — 24–48 hours processing vs Spice Prop's potential 7-day manual review. The 100% profit split milestone at FTP is also significantly better than Spice Prop's 80–90% capping.
🏆 Winner: FTP
Pass Probability Analysis
This is the section most comparison sites ignore, but it's the one that actually matters.
Passing depends on three things: profit target difficulty, drawdown flexibility & rule enforcement.
Spice Prop Sweet Pepper 2-Step:
● Lower targets — 4–7.5% per phase
● Static drawdown — predictable
● 30% consistency rule applies
Estimated pass probability (average trader): 30–40%
FTP 2-Step Classic:
● Higher targets — 7% / 7%
● Static drawdown — predictable
● 35% consistency rule in evaluation
● Symbol Loss Limit 3%
Estimated pass probability (average trader): 25–35%
Key insight: Spice Prop's lower targets & simpler rule set make it more accessible for traders who are still developing consistency. FTP's funded stage consistency tightening to 50% is the most significant post-evaluation surprise.
🏆 Winner: Spice Prop
Difficulty Score
| Model | Difficulty |
|---|---|
| Spice Prop Mini Pepper | 1/5 |
| Spice Prop Sweet Pepper | 2/5 |
| Spice Prop Chilli Pepper | 2/5 |
| Spice Prop Jalapeño Instant | 3/5 |
| FTP Instant Funding | 3/5 |
| FTP 1-Step Express | 3/5 |
| FTP 2-Step Classic | 4/5 |
Best For Each Trading Style
Spice Prop is better suited for:
● Beginners who want lower profit targets & simpler rules
● Traders who want static drawdown across all models
● Traders who copy trades between their own accounts
● Traders who want VPN/VPS flexibility
● Traders looking for an affordable entry point — Mini Pepper from €45
Funded Trading Plus is better suited for:
● Traders who want 100% profit split after performance milestones
● Traders who want scaling to $2.5M with a more established firm
● Traders who want faster payout processing — 24–48 hours
● EA traders comfortable with potential source code review
Final Score
| Category | Spice Prop | FTP | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of Passing | 9/10 | 7/10 | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
| Rule Clarity | 8/10 | 7/10 | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
| Payout Speed | 6/10 | 9/10 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Profit Split | 7/10 | 9/10 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Trust & Track Record | 6/10 | 8/10 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Drawdown Simplicity | 9/10 | 7/10 | 🏆 Winner: Spice Prop |
| Scaling Potential | 8/10 | 9/10 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
| Overall | 7.6/10 | 8.0/10 | 🏆 Winner: FTP |
Final Verdict
For most traders just starting out, Spice Prop is the easier & more accessible choice — lower targets, simpler rules, static drawdown across all models & an entry point from €45 that removes most of the financial risk from a first attempt.
Funded Trading Plus wins on long-term value — 100% profit split after milestones, faster payouts & a more established three-year track record make it the better fit for traders who are ready to commit to a more structured environment.
If you're new to prop trading or testing a new strategy — Spice Prop is the lower-risk entry point. If you want better payouts & faster processing — FTP is worth the extra rule complexity.
Check current offers before choosing:
● View Funded Trading Plus Offers
Pricing and discounts change frequently, and choosing at the right moment can make a difference.
