Targets & Drawdowns
Profit Target Step 1
5.0%
Profit Target Step 2
5.0%
Profit Target Step 3
5.0%
Daily Drawdown
5.0%
Max Drawdown
10.0%
Drawdown Type
Static
Rules
Time Limit
Unlimited
Profit Split
80%
Payout Frequency
BI-weekly
Additional Rules
Minimum activity rule: There is no minimum trading day requirement. Traders must execute at least 6 trades per phase, allowing flexibility but also encouraging unnecessary trades.
Multi-phase pressure: The 3-step structure requires traders to repeat performance across multiple phases, increasing psychological pressure compared to 1-step or 2-step models.
Mixed drawdown model: The maximum drawdown is static and based on balance, while the daily drawdown is equity-based and includes floating losses.
Intraday risk trap: Traders can breach the daily loss limit during open trades due to floating losses, especially during volatile market conditions.
No profit protection: The static drawdown does not increase as profits grow, meaning gains are not locked and can be fully lost.
Phase repetition risk: Each phase must be passed sequentially. Failing any phase resets progress, forcing traders to restart from the beginning.
Fast-pass potential: With no minimum trading days, traders can theoretically pass each phase quickly, but consistency must still be maintained across all steps.
Execution risk: Slippage and spread widening during volatile sessions can accelerate drawdown breaches, particularly when trading aggressively.
Consistency fatigue: Repeating performance across 3 phases can lead to mental fatigue, causing traders to lose discipline over time.
False confidence trap: Passing early phases can create overconfidence, leading to increased risk-taking in later stages.
Reset frustration: Failing Phase 3 after completing earlier phases forces a full restart, which significantly impacts motivation.
Overtrading risk: The 6-trade minimum can push traders to take unnecessary setups, reducing overall trade quality.
Drawdown mismatch: The combination of static max drawdown and equity-based daily loss can confuse traders and lead to unexpected breaches.
Time drain: Although each phase has a relatively small target, completing all 3 phases can take longer than expected.
Discipline breakdown: Traders often perform well initially but fail in later phases due to impatience and reduced focus.
Multi-phase pressure: The 3-step structure requires traders to repeat performance across multiple phases, increasing psychological pressure compared to 1-step or 2-step models.
Mixed drawdown model: The maximum drawdown is static and based on balance, while the daily drawdown is equity-based and includes floating losses.
Intraday risk trap: Traders can breach the daily loss limit during open trades due to floating losses, especially during volatile market conditions.
No profit protection: The static drawdown does not increase as profits grow, meaning gains are not locked and can be fully lost.
Phase repetition risk: Each phase must be passed sequentially. Failing any phase resets progress, forcing traders to restart from the beginning.
Fast-pass potential: With no minimum trading days, traders can theoretically pass each phase quickly, but consistency must still be maintained across all steps.
Execution risk: Slippage and spread widening during volatile sessions can accelerate drawdown breaches, particularly when trading aggressively.
Consistency fatigue: Repeating performance across 3 phases can lead to mental fatigue, causing traders to lose discipline over time.
False confidence trap: Passing early phases can create overconfidence, leading to increased risk-taking in later stages.
Reset frustration: Failing Phase 3 after completing earlier phases forces a full restart, which significantly impacts motivation.
Overtrading risk: The 6-trade minimum can push traders to take unnecessary setups, reducing overall trade quality.
Drawdown mismatch: The combination of static max drawdown and equity-based daily loss can confuse traders and lead to unexpected breaches.
Time drain: Although each phase has a relatively small target, completing all 3 phases can take longer than expected.
Discipline breakdown: Traders often perform well initially but fail in later phases due to impatience and reduced focus.
Scaling Plan
RebelsFunding Bronze follows a traditional scaling approach based on long-term performance rather than fixed milestones.
After becoming funded, traders may receive increased capital allocation over time depending on consistency, profitability, and payout history.
Scaling is not automatic and does not follow a predefined percentage increase. Instead, it is discretionary and gradual.
This model prioritizes trader consistency over aggressive account growth, making it suitable for traders focused on steady performance rather than rapid scaling.
After becoming funded, traders may receive increased capital allocation over time depending on consistency, profitability, and payout history.
Scaling is not automatic and does not follow a predefined percentage increase. Instead, it is discretionary and gradual.
This model prioritizes trader consistency over aggressive account growth, making it suitable for traders focused on steady performance rather than rapid scaling.
