Targets & Drawdowns
Profit Target Step 1
10.0%
Daily Drawdown
0.0%
Max Drawdown
6.0%
Drawdown Type
Static
Rules
Time Limit
Unlimited
Profit Split
75%
Payout Frequency
BI-weekly
Additional Rules
Single-phase evaluation: The Gold challenge uses a 1-step model, allowing traders to become funded after reaching a single profit target.
No daily drawdown (challenge phase): During the evaluation, there is no daily loss limit. Traders are not restricted by intraday drawdown, allowing more flexibility in trade management.
Static maximum drawdown: The maximum drawdown is balance-based and does not trail or increase as profits grow.
Funded phase restriction: Once funded, a 4% daily drawdown is applied and calculated based on equity, including floating losses.
Intraday flexibility advantage: The absence of a daily drawdown in the challenge allows traders to manage positions more freely without the risk of instant intraday breaches.
Minimum activity rule: There is no minimum trading day requirement. Traders must complete at least 6 trades to pass the challenge.
No profit protection: The static drawdown does not increase with profits, meaning gains are not locked and can be fully lost.
Fast-track potential: With no daily loss limit and no time restrictions, traders can complete the challenge quickly if the profit target is reached.
No daily drawdown illusion: While the absence of a daily loss limit during the challenge offers flexibility, it can lead traders to take excessive risk without realizing how quickly losses can accumulate.
Funded phase shock: Many traders pass the challenge comfortably but struggle after funding when the 4% daily drawdown is introduced.
Overleverage trap: The lack of intraday restriction often encourages traders to increase position size, leading to faster drawdown breaches.
All-or-nothing pressure: With only one phase, failing close to the profit target results in a full reset, increasing emotional pressure.
No buffer protection: The static drawdown does not increase as profits grow, meaning gains are not secured and can be lost quickly.
Transition risk: The shift from no daily drawdown (challenge) to strict daily limits (funded) creates a major adjustment that many traders underestimate.
No daily drawdown (challenge phase): During the evaluation, there is no daily loss limit. Traders are not restricted by intraday drawdown, allowing more flexibility in trade management.
Static maximum drawdown: The maximum drawdown is balance-based and does not trail or increase as profits grow.
Funded phase restriction: Once funded, a 4% daily drawdown is applied and calculated based on equity, including floating losses.
Intraday flexibility advantage: The absence of a daily drawdown in the challenge allows traders to manage positions more freely without the risk of instant intraday breaches.
Minimum activity rule: There is no minimum trading day requirement. Traders must complete at least 6 trades to pass the challenge.
No profit protection: The static drawdown does not increase with profits, meaning gains are not locked and can be fully lost.
Fast-track potential: With no daily loss limit and no time restrictions, traders can complete the challenge quickly if the profit target is reached.
No daily drawdown illusion: While the absence of a daily loss limit during the challenge offers flexibility, it can lead traders to take excessive risk without realizing how quickly losses can accumulate.
Funded phase shock: Many traders pass the challenge comfortably but struggle after funding when the 4% daily drawdown is introduced.
Overleverage trap: The lack of intraday restriction often encourages traders to increase position size, leading to faster drawdown breaches.
All-or-nothing pressure: With only one phase, failing close to the profit target results in a full reset, increasing emotional pressure.
No buffer protection: The static drawdown does not increase as profits grow, meaning gains are not secured and can be lost quickly.
Transition risk: The shift from no daily drawdown (challenge) to strict daily limits (funded) creates a major adjustment that many traders underestimate.
Scaling Plan
RebelsFunding Gold uses a performance-based scaling model after funding, rather than fixed milestone increases.
There is no aggressive scaling system such as account doubling. Instead, account growth depends on consistent performance, risk management, and payout history.
Scaling is gradual and discretionary, designed to reward traders who maintain discipline over time.
This makes the program more suitable for traders focused on stable profitability rather than rapid capital expansion.
There is no aggressive scaling system such as account doubling. Instead, account growth depends on consistent performance, risk management, and payout history.
Scaling is gradual and discretionary, designed to reward traders who maintain discipline over time.
This makes the program more suitable for traders focused on stable profitability rather than rapid capital expansion.
